셀렝게유역 통합물환경관리모델 개발 연구 III

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 추장민 -
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-05T01:35:39Z -
dc.date.available 2017-07-05T01:35:39Z -
dc.date.issued 20100730 -
dc.identifier A 환1185 정2010-02 -
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kei.re.kr/handle/2017.oak/19534 -
dc.identifier.uri http://library.kei.re.kr/dmme/img/001/003/001/정책2010-02(추장민)[1].pdf -
dc.description.abstract This project has been launched in order to develop an integrated water management model in the Selenge River Basin (the SRB). This report describes the results of Phase III, and includes: 1) State of Water Environment and Resources, 2) Domestic Integrated Water Management Model, 3) Transboundary Water Management System, and 4) International Cooperation for IWRM. Three field studies were performed through 2006-2008. In total, 68 sampling stations were identified, with 39 stations in Mongolia and 21 stations in Russia. The results of analysis indicated that pollution sources in the SRB originated from mining areas. The highest SS (Suspended Solid)were at SM10, and SM21 it was measured at the beginning of theagricultural irrigation which the dark stream water was caused by rain and discharge from gold mining sites in Mongolia. Main sources of pollution identified in Mongolia were Zaamar gold placer, upstream along the Orkhon River, the Shar River gold mining, population/settlements, agriculture and WWTPs. We have been identified eight Hot Spot areas in two countries, Mongolia and Russia-Buryatia. The water quality issues originated problems of mining and urbanization. In order to improve the water quality conditions in the Selenge River Basin, we need to identify the exact locations of the Hot Spots and observe the existing management measures. After that the efficiency of the treatment operations for mitigation of pressure on water quality and improvement of local water quality condition should be checked. The origins of water quality pollutions are different from place to place (mining and urbanized areas). The management options and approaches have to be properly defined and established according to management priorities. To determine the management priorities, we used the mDSS model. The data was pretreated for main issue priorities using expert survey analysis, weighting the issues priorities and normalized numbers of the weighted values, and fitting the data in the mDSS software. In the process of design of mDSS model, the database (DB) was transferred into analysis matrix (AM). Then it was setted by the ideal point method (TOPSIS). By aggregating the group members' preferences in the group decision, the final solution rank was achieved by the borda rule. In addition to the mDSS modeling, we performed expert survey. Thissurvey showed that some implemented management measures is not sufficient and effective for mitigation and protection of water bodies within SRB dueto rough inobservance of rule in operation/working, outdated and inoperative technical equipments, and some other nonprofessional approaches in environment regulation. The origins of water quality pollutions are different from place to place. The management options and ordering of its implementation should be properly defined and established. On the last workshop meeting in Mongolia, some recommendations were suggested for implementing management measures, for mining and urbanized areas in both countries. The recommendations are considering institutional, infrastructural and government alternatives. Based on the result of our surveys, we have defined the following: affected reaches within the Selenge River Basin and order priorities for implementation of management measures and its strengthening. In addition to these expertsurvey results, feasibility analysis was performed to identify which policy options are possible or impossible in Mongolia and Russia. Most policy alternatives have high administrative feasibility in both Mongolia and Russia. However the Mongolian and Russian experts have tended to assign low numbers to economic feasibility. For each country, integrated water management on the SRB is a long term goal, but its introduction may not be readily available. Therefore it is recommended to gradually proceed with relevant domestic policies in each country. Therefore in this report, three stages are suggested forwarding the integrated water management onthe SRB. Lastly, a sustained management of water-related indicators should be a part of the SRB integrated water management plan. In transboundary water management, this report introduced the transboundary river theory, issues of transboundary river management, transboundary river cooperation case studiesin other regions and countries. The characteristics of the SRB as a transboundary river are identified by analyzing the situation of the SRB. Also, we have conducted expert survey in Korea, Mongolia and Russiafor selecting the policy alternative on transboundary water management system. This report suggested the basic design of transboundary water management system for theSRB. The basic design of transboundary water management system is; first, to step up the level of current cooperation system implementing committee is recommended in order to ensure the systematic and stable implementation of the cooperation projects, going a step further from the current governmental representative meeting. Second, extend the scope of the projects by organizing specialist groups and working groups to facilitate the management system. Third, build a joint monitoring network and information sharing system on water quality and water resources in each country. Fourth, perform a joint EIA on basin development projects, such as developing water resources. Fifth, implementation schemes should be built and fiscal investment should increase at the national levels to guarantee the effectiveness of the management system. Sixth, as regards such issues as level and nature of transboundary water management agreement and the organization in charge of transboundary water management system, and water flow allocation, building a long-term channel for strategic dialogue is recommendable. As noted before, there is a need for the joint management of the SRB water management indicators currently managed on domestic levels of each country. To address this issue,major monitoring spots in the SRB should be designated, and an integrated water management data from scientific and objective measurement should be accumulated and shared. This will serve as an important basis for mutual consultation and coordination in future development projects of the Selenge River. Finally, we suggested the Korea-Mongolia-Russia Environmental Cooperation Project on Water Management System for establishingand implementing IWMM on the SRB. The environmental cooperation projectsin water resources development area projects include1) studyingon the treated waste water reuse project in metropolitan of M/R, 2) Rationalizing the groundwater utilization in M/R, 3) working water resources development project. The environmental cooperation projects in water management area include 1) the non-point source management in M/R, 2) automated water quality/quantity monitoring system, 3) improvement of the water/wastewater management system, 4) environment capacity building projects. This report also suggests transferring technology for industrial waste water treatment in mining areas as a prior cooperation project of SD. Lastly, the implementation scheme for environmental cooperation project between Korea and other countries is suggested. -
dc.description.tableofcontents ChapterⅠ. Introduction <br> <br> <br> <br>1. Objectives and Research Components <br> <br> A. Objectives and Core Activities <br> B. Research Components <br> <br>2. Summary of Phase I and Ⅱ Research <br> <br>3. Purpose and Main Issue of Phase Ⅲ <br> <br>4. History of the Project <br> <br>5. Structure of Report <br> <br> <br> <br>Chapter II. State of Water Environment and Resources in SRB <br> <br> <br> <br>1. Water Environment State of SRB <br> <br> A. Water Quality Measurements and Analysis <br> B. Water Quality Characteristics of SRB <br> C. Summary <br> <br>2. Water Environment State of Hotspot area <br> <br> A. Background of Hotspot Area <br> B. Hotspot Areas of Mongolia <br> C. Hotspot Areas of Russia <br> D. Summary <br> <br>3. Water Resource State of SRB <br> <br> A. Rainfall Characteristics of SRB <br> B. Surface water Characteristics of SRB <br> C. Ground Water Characteristics of SRB <br> D. Dam Development Plan for Mongolia <br> E. Selenge River Networking <br> F. Flooding on the Sele -
dc.description.tableofcontents <br> <br> <br> <br> ChapterⅠ. Introduction <br> 1. Objectives and Research Components <br> A. Objectives and Core Activities <br> B. Research Components <br> 2. Summary of Phase I and Ⅱ Research <br> 3. Purpose and Main Issue of Phase Ⅲ <br> 4. History of the Project <br> 5. Structure of Report <br> Chapter II. State of Water Environment and Resources in SRB <br> 1. Water Environment State of SRB <br> A. Water Quality Measurements and Analysis <br> B. Water Quality Characteristics of SRB <br> C. Summary <br> 2. Water Environment State of Hotspot area <br> A. Background of Hotspot Area <br> B. Hotspot Areas of Mongolia <br> C. Hotspot Areas of Russia <br> D. Summary <br> 3. Water Resource State of SRB <br> A. Rainfall Characteristics of SRB <br> B. Surface water Characteristics of SRB <br> C. Ground Water Characteristics of SRB <br> D. Dam Development Plan for Mongolia <br> E. Selenge River Networking <br> F. Flooding on the Selenge River and their consequences <br> Chapter IV. Domestic Integrated Water Management Model on SRB <br> 1. Introduction IWRM <br> A. Background of IWRM <br> 2. Hotspot area Policy Alternatives by mDSS modeling <br> A. Background of mDSS modeling <br> B. Application of the mDSS Modeling to the Selenge project <br> C. The Mongolian part <br> D. The Russian part <br> 3. Expert Survey and Result <br> A. Background of expert survey <br> B. The results of expert survey <br> C. Summary <br> D. Feasibility analysis <br> 4. Policy Alternative on Domestic IWMM <br> A. Policy Implication of water state of SRB and survey results <br> B. Design of IWMM on SRB <br> Chapter IV.Transboundary Water Management System on SRB <br> 1. Introduction Transboundary River <br> A. Transboundary river theory <br> B. Issues of Transboundary river management <br> C. Transboundary river Cooperation case study <br> D. Characteristics of SRB as a Transboundary River <br> 2. Expert survey and Result <br> A. Background of expert survey <br> B. The results of expert survey <br> C. Summary <br> 3. Policy Alternative on Transboundary Water Management System <br> A. Policy Implication of Transboundary Water Issues and Survey Results <br> B. Design of Transboundary water management system on SRB <br> Chapter Ⅴ. International Cooperation for IWMM on SRB <br> 1. Korea-Mongolia-Russia Environmental Cooperation Projects on Water Management System <br> A.Cooperation Project of Development Water Resources Area <br> B. Cooperation Project of Water Management Area <br> C. Cooperation Project of SD in Mining Industrial Area <br> D. Alternative Financial Resources for improving water management <br> 2. Implementation Scheme for Environmental Cooperation Projects <br> A. System of Implementation of Cooperation Project <br> B. Process for the Cooperation Project <br> Chapter Ⅵ. Summary and Conclusion <br> References <br> Appendix 1. Data and Results of Water Quality Analysis <br> Appendix 2. Expert Survey Questionaire -
dc.description.tableofcontents <br> ChapterⅠ. Introduction <br> 1. Objectives and Research Components <br> A. Objectives and Core Activities <br> B. Research Components <br> 2. Summary of Phase I and Ⅱ Research <br> 3. Purpose and Main Issue of Phase Ⅲ <br> 4. History of the Project <br> 5. Structure of Report <br> Chapter II. State of Water Environment and Resources in SRB <br> 1. Water Environment State of SRB <br> A. Water Quality Measurements and Analysis <br> B. Water Quality Characteristics of SRB <br> C. Summary <br> 2. Water Environment State of Hotspot area <br> A. Background of Hotspot Area <br> B. Hotspot Areas of Mongolia <br> C. Hotspot Areas of Russia <br> D. Summary <br> 3. Water Resource State of SRB <br> A. Rainfall Characteristics of SRB <br> B. Surface water Characteristics of SRB <br> C. Ground Water Characteristics of SRB <br> D. Dam Development Plan for Mongolia <br> E. Selenge River Networking <br> F. Flooding on the Selenge River and their consequences <br> Chapter ?. Domestic Integrated Water Management Model on SRB <br> 1. Introduction IWRM <br> A. Background of IWRM <br> 2. Hotspot area Policy Alternatives by mDSS modeling <br> A. Background of mDSS modeling <br> B. Application of the mDSS Modeling to the Selenge project <br> C. The Mongolian part <br> D. The Russian part <br> 3. Expert Survey and Result <br> A. Background of expert survey <br> B. The results of expert survey <br> C. Summary <br> D. Feasibility analysis <br> 4. Policy Alternative on Domestic IWMM <br> A. Policy Implication of water state of SRB and survey results <br> B. Design of IWMM on SRB <br> <br> Chapter IV.Transboundary Water Management System on SRB <br> 1. Introduction Transboundary River <br> A. Transboundary river theory <br> B. Issues of Transboundary river management <br> C. Transboundary river Cooperation case study <br> D. Characteristics of SRB as a Transboundary River <br> 2. Expert survey and Result <br> A. Background of expert survey <br> B. The results of expert survey <br> C. Summary <br> 3. Policy Alternative on Transboundary Water Management System <br> A. Policy Implication of Transboundary Water Issues and Survey Results <br> B. Design of Transboundary water management system on SRB <br> <br> Chapter Ⅴ. International Cooperation for IWMM on SRB <br> 1. Korea-Mongolia-Russia Environmental Cooperation Projects on Water Management System <br> A.Cooperation Project of Development Water Resources Area <br> B. Cooperation Project of Water Management Area <br> C. Cooperation Project of SD in Mining Industrial Area <br> D. Alternative Financial Resources for improving water management <br> 2. Implementation Scheme for Environmental Cooperation Projects <br> A. System of Implementation of Cooperation Project <br> B. Process for the Cooperation Project <br> <br> Chapter Ⅵ. Summary and Conclusion <br> <br> References <br> <br> Appendix 1. Data and Results of Water Quality Analysis <br> <br> Appendix 2. Expert Survey Questionaire <br> -
dc.format.extent 304 p. -
dc.language 한국어 -
dc.publisher 한국환경정책·평가연구원 -
dc.title 셀렝게유역 통합물환경관리모델 개발 연구 III -
dc.type 수시연구 -
dc.title.original Integrated water management model on the selenge river basin -
dc.title.alternativeoriginal Development and evaluation of the IWMM on the SRB(phase 3) -
dc.title.partname 정책보고서 -
dc.title.partnumber 2010-02 -
dc.description.keyword 물환경 -
dc.description.bibliographicalintroduction 셀렝게강은 몽골의 항가인산맥에서 발원하여 러시아연방 부리야티아 공화국의 바이칼호수로 유입되는 월경성 국제하천으로, 이 강의 상류에 위치한 몽골의 수자원이용 및 수질관리가 하류에 있는 부리야티아 공화국의 물 환경에 직접적인 영향을 미치게 된다. 몽골은 오래 전부터 강수량 부족으로 물 공급에 제한을 받고 있으며, 광산업의 성장과 급속한 경제개발로 인한 수질오염도 점차 심각해지고 있다. 한편 부리야티아 공화국은 몽골과는 달리 풍부한 수자원을 보유하고 있지만, 대부분의 물 공급 및 수처리 시설들이 낙후되고 비효율적이어서 물 관리에 어려움을 겪고 있다. 이처럼 국제공유하천은 자연적으로는 단일하천과 단일유역이지만, 이를 공유하고 있는 국가들의 현황과 요구 등이 상이하게 나타난다. 따라서 이를 효율적이고 체계적으로 관리하기 위해서는 국가들의 이해관계를 통합할 수 있는 관리방안이 필요하다. 본 연구는 셀렝게강 유역의 통합 물 관리 모델을 개발하기 위해 시작되었다. 이번 보고서는 3차년도에 해당하며, 1) 수환경과 수자원, 2) 국내 통합 물 관리 모델, 3) 공유하천 물 관리 체계, 4) 국제 공유하천유역 물 관리를 위한 국제적 협력을 포함하고 있다. 본 보고서는 기존의 연구 문헌 및 자료를 조사·분석한 선행연구와 현지조사 및 담당자 면담 등을 통해 경제사회현황, 수자원 및 수질현황을 조사한 1, 2단계 연구내용을 바탕으로 3단계의 현장조사를 통해 수질 및 수환경, 사회경제적 여건을 분석하여몽골과 러시아의 셀렝게강 유역 주요 8개 대도시 및 광산도시를Hot Spot areas (HSAs) 라고 명명하였다. 우선, 주요 오염원인 이 지역의 위치를 정확히 파악하고현 관리체계를 분석했다. 그후 수질을 악화시키는 압력조건개선에 대한 효율성을 확인하여 관리 옵션과 접근방식에 대해 분석하는 DPSIR 접근방식을 이용하였다. 이 조사결과를 근거로 몽골과 부리야티아 공화국의 셀렝게강 유역 전반에 대한 현황을 DPSIR 접근방법을 통해 분석하고 물 관리 체계에 대한 주요 문제점 및 물 관련 이슈들을 도출하였다. 이를 근거로 몽골, 러시아의 전문가들을 대상으로 가중치 조사를 실시하고 이 결과를 mDSS 모델을 이용하여 분석하여 정책우선순위를 도출하였다. mDSS 소프트웨어를 이용하여 주요 문제의 우선 순위, 가중치 값을 표준화하였고, mDSS 모델의 설계 과정에서 데이터베이스(DB) 분석, 이상적 포인트 방식 (TOPSIS) 과정을 거쳐, borda 규칙에 의해 우선순위 정책대안을 얻었다. 3단계연구 수행을 위해 국제워크숍, 작업반회의가 몽골에서 개최되었고 셀렝게강 유역 현지조사가 실시되었다. mDSS 모델링 이외에, 전문가 설문 조사를 수행했다. 이 설문 조사를 통해 몽골, 러시아의 현행 수질관리제도가 충분하지 않으며, 효과적이지 않다는 결론을 얻게 되었다. 따라서 수질오염원에 따른 수질 관리 정책이 마련되어야 하며, 제도, 인프라, 정부대안의 세 가지 요소가 모두 필요하다 그리고 전문가 설문조사 이외에 제시된 정책 옵션들이 몽골과 러시아에서 실행가능한지 아닌지를 분석하는 실행가능성 분석이 실시되었다. 대부분의 정책대안들이 행정상으로는 실행가능성이 높게 평가되었으나, 경제적으로는 실행가능성이 낮다고 평가되었다. 각 국가에서 셀렝게강 유역의 통합 물 관리는 장기적 목표이기 때문에 즉시 도입하기 힘들어 보일 수도 있다. 그러나 점차적으로 각 국가의 관련 국내정책을 추진하는 것이 필요하다. 따라서 이 보고서는 통합 물 관리의 필요성과 물 관련 지표의 지속적인 관리가 통합 물 관리 계획에 포함되어야 한다는 내용을 포함하고 있다. 또한 이 보고서는 공유하천의 물 관리에 대한 협력 연구 사례 및 이론을 포함하고 있으며, 몽골과 러시아의 입장을 파악하기 위한 전문가 설문을 실시하여 이를 바탕으로 셀렝게강 물 관리 시스템의 기본설계를 제안했다. 주요 내용은 첫째, 현정부 대표회의에서 위원회를 구성하여 협력사업을 체계적으로 진행하는 것이다. 둘째, 전문가 그룹을 조직하고 관리시스템을 추진하기 위해 프로젝트의 범위를 확장하는 것이다. 셋째, 각 나라의 수질과 수자원에 대한 공동감시 네트워크 및 정보 공유 시스템 구축이 필요하다. 넷째, 국가 수준의 실행 제도 구축 및 재정 투자를 통해 실행 가능성을 높여야 한다. 다섯째, 전략적 장기적 대화 채널 구축을 통해 물 관리 시스템 담당 조직을 신설해야 한다. 마지막으로 이 연구는 셀렝게강 유역의 통합 물 관리 정책을 실행하기 위한 한국-몽골-러시아 환경협력 프로젝트를 제안했다. 제안된 환경협력 프로젝트는 1) 몽골, 러시아 대도시의 하수 처리 수 재이용, 2) 몽골, 러시아의 지하수이용 합리화, 3) 수자원 사업개발 4) 환경 역량강화 프로젝트이다. 이 보고서는 또한 환경협력사업 실행 이전에 광산 지역의 산업폐수 처리기술 이전을 제안하고 있으며, 마지막으로 한국과 다른 나라와의 환경협력 프로젝트 체계를 포함하고 있다. -
dc.contributor.authoralternativename Chu -
dc.contributor.authoralternativename Jang-Min -
Appears in Collections:
Reports(보고서) > Policy Study(정책보고서)
Files in This Item:

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse